Keret is known for his surreal short stories, and I appreciate his idea that “everybody’s life is potentially surreal.” This resonates with my own views, but it also seems very appropriate, given that Keret’s writing often starts with a seemingly normal, mundane premise that veers violently, strangely into the unknown. For instance, his story “Crazy Glue” explores marital infidelity by having the wife glue herself to the ceiling of the couple’s home. I’m really interested in the turn his stories make, and it strikes me that it’s a very similar kind of turn to the one Keret describes experiencing while visiting New York. I’m curious how one–as a person generally, but especially as a writer–can cultivate the openness Keret seems to have, the facility for not passing by those “gateways to surreal worlds” that present themselves in everyday life.
I’m also cheered by the story he tells about being discouraged from writing by a classmate when he was in college. For one thing, this is encouraging because I do believe that success isn’t measured solely by talent. Sometimes the people with lots of talent can’t stick with it, and the people with a modest amount of talent and a lot of persistence are the ones who are able to go the distance in the end. As Keret says, after being told he should give up writing, he just kept on writing: “I went home and kept writing stories. I never wrote because I felt I was good at writing. I wrote because I felt I had to.” That drive, I think, is what distinguishes promising writers from good writers. The really good writers keep working at something they find challenging, not because of what others will say, but because they feel they have to.